Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 30.06.2025 02:26

Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Elon Musk's robotaxi has a serious problem - TheStreet
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
What’s next?
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Astronomers discover a tiny star with a giant planet that should not exist - Earth.com
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Thank you.
Cal Raleigh’s heroics can’t save Mariners as Orioles complete sweep - The Seattle Times
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Largest Horned Dinosaur Ever Found Looks Like It Walked Off a Marvel Set - Indian Defence Review
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Just in the last 5 years:
What legal actions can be taken if a neighbor's unleashed dog causes harm or injury?
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Farewell to the Penny — A Tiny Coin’s Outsized Legacy - PYMNTS.com